Architectural Design Patterns 3 – Microservices

In this article, we will be talking about Microservices, a design pattern that has gained attraction for its approach to building large and complex software applications. At its core, Microservices is about breaking down an app into smaller parts where each part doing its own job. Instead of one big chunk of software that does everything, you have multiple little services working together. Each microservice is responsible for its own task but collaborating with others to function properly.

This approach shines in many situations, especially in cloud-based systems. The cloud is like massive land ready for construction. Microservices allow developers to build or upgrade one part of their software (say, a single shop in the city) without disturbing the others. This flexibility means faster updates, easier scaling, and better fault isolation. If one service fails, it doesn’t bring down the whole application.

However, like everything in tech, Microservices isn’t a magic wound. Critics often point out that this pattern can lead to complicated setups. Each service might need its database or server, leading to more things to manage and monitor. Also, while it’s easy to start with a few services, as the number grows, the complexity can become a headache.

Is Microservices architecture possible in on-premise systems? Yes. While the pattern made waves in the cloud world, businesses with on-premise infrastructure can also benefit from it. It’s about rethinking and restructuring the software rather than where it’s hosted. The principles remain the same.

One of the cool things about Microservices is how it gels with modern containerization technologies like Docker and Kubernetes. These tools offer ways to pack, deploy, and manage software. When each microservice is placed inside its container, it becomes portable, isolated, and easy to scale. It’s like giving each shop in our city analogy its own protective bubble, making it resilient and self-sufficient.

Now, some folks might say, “Isn’t this just like SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture)?” Well they are not wrong since they’re cousins, but not twins. While both focus on breaking software into services, Microservices takes it further by ensuring each service is fully independent, often having its database and environment. SOA, on the other hand, might have shared databases and be more tightly coupled.

In wrapping our chat about Microservices, it’s clear that while it offers many advantages, it is essential to understand its challenges. As with any architectural pattern, it is about using the right tool for the job, keeping both the advantages and potential pitfalls in mind.

Suleyman Cabir Ataman, PhD

Sharing on social media: